So much is made out of India voting against Israel and USA in UN General Assembly. It could at least have abstained. May be the mandarins of our foreign policy sitting in North Block still finds it difficult to shed off their Cold War and Non-alignment mindset.
But it is not the end of the world. These UN votes hardly mean anything. America has already vetoed in Security Council supporting Israel declaring Jerusalem as their Capital. The highly powerful Israeli Lobby AIPAC (America Israel Political Action Committee) bankrolled by the Jewish Billionaires has a big say in formulating pro-Israel foreign policy in Washington.
US has been a steadfast supporter of Israel since the inception of the state in 1948. Harry Truman, the then President of The United States was the first to recognize the Jewish state. Ever since America has given its unstinting support to Israel, in terms of Aids, Weapons and diplomatic support as and when needed.
In June, 1981 following the Israeli strike on the Iraqi Nuclear Reactor on the outskirts of Baghdad, US promptly vetoed any UN resolution against Israel. I still vividly remember this cartoon by R K Laxman on the front page of Times Of India, where the UN Secretary General says to the recalcitrant, mockingly grimacing Israeli PM Menacgem Begin - "The more you launch such an attack, you will be condemned more severely".
36 years down the road, not much has changed. United Nations, arguably the world's biggest, bloated bureaucracy which houses a bunch of entitlement seekers, famous for their efficiency and lack of accountability. A spineless organization, it is known more for failures than success on its Balance Sheet ever since its inception in 1945.
A sizable amount of its maintenance is born by the Americans Taxpayers. Now high time it is dissolved, or US kicks them out of its own soil. What a blatant waste of prime real estate properties in New York and Washington DC, which can be used for far better purpose.
The nations in United Nations, in contrary to the name suggests, are hardly United. In spite of tons of money poured into many poor nations (mostly American money), those nations still languish in poverty. Those who have succeeded in moving 10s of millions out of poverty (notably China and India), have done so by helping themselves and with some help from Private charitable agenies, rather than anything remotely from UN.
At least a year ago Saudi Arabia headed the UN council of Human Rights. Amongst its other members is China, another Champion of human rights violation, completing the league of distinguished gentlemen of the so called protectors of Human rights.
The Security Council is used as the personal fiefdom of its veto wielding members, to further their own selfish agenda. It has hardly achieved any world peace and stability, which was supposed to be the primary goal when the organization was formed 70 years ago.
Now Philippines not so long ago threatend to come out if UN, a trend would be set for more nations to come out of this behemoth global Babudom. Hopefully it is the harbinger of the demise of this monolithic structure, the sooner the better.
So, Why stick to an institute which after scores of years of existence, has far more failures than achievements to its credit. In my opinion completely getting rid of it, won't hurt anything. A world without UN will be more or less the same - sans billions of wasted dollars.
But it is not the end of the world. These UN votes hardly mean anything. America has already vetoed in Security Council supporting Israel declaring Jerusalem as their Capital. The highly powerful Israeli Lobby AIPAC (America Israel Political Action Committee) bankrolled by the Jewish Billionaires has a big say in formulating pro-Israel foreign policy in Washington.
US has been a steadfast supporter of Israel since the inception of the state in 1948. Harry Truman, the then President of The United States was the first to recognize the Jewish state. Ever since America has given its unstinting support to Israel, in terms of Aids, Weapons and diplomatic support as and when needed.
In June, 1981 following the Israeli strike on the Iraqi Nuclear Reactor on the outskirts of Baghdad, US promptly vetoed any UN resolution against Israel. I still vividly remember this cartoon by R K Laxman on the front page of Times Of India, where the UN Secretary General says to the recalcitrant, mockingly grimacing Israeli PM Menacgem Begin - "The more you launch such an attack, you will be condemned more severely".
36 years down the road, not much has changed. United Nations, arguably the world's biggest, bloated bureaucracy which houses a bunch of entitlement seekers, famous for their efficiency and lack of accountability. A spineless organization, it is known more for failures than success on its Balance Sheet ever since its inception in 1945.
A sizable amount of its maintenance is born by the Americans Taxpayers. Now high time it is dissolved, or US kicks them out of its own soil. What a blatant waste of prime real estate properties in New York and Washington DC, which can be used for far better purpose.
The nations in United Nations, in contrary to the name suggests, are hardly United. In spite of tons of money poured into many poor nations (mostly American money), those nations still languish in poverty. Those who have succeeded in moving 10s of millions out of poverty (notably China and India), have done so by helping themselves and with some help from Private charitable agenies, rather than anything remotely from UN.
At least a year ago Saudi Arabia headed the UN council of Human Rights. Amongst its other members is China, another Champion of human rights violation, completing the league of distinguished gentlemen of the so called protectors of Human rights.
The Security Council is used as the personal fiefdom of its veto wielding members, to further their own selfish agenda. It has hardly achieved any world peace and stability, which was supposed to be the primary goal when the organization was formed 70 years ago.
Now Philippines not so long ago threatend to come out if UN, a trend would be set for more nations to come out of this behemoth global Babudom. Hopefully it is the harbinger of the demise of this monolithic structure, the sooner the better.
So, Why stick to an institute which after scores of years of existence, has far more failures than achievements to its credit. In my opinion completely getting rid of it, won't hurt anything. A world without UN will be more or less the same - sans billions of wasted dollars.
No comments:
Post a Comment